mirror of
https://github.com/Pungyeon/clean-go-article.git
synced 2024-11-10 01:14:04 +00:00
commit
1f5e6b3f04
|
@ -145,7 +145,7 @@ func fileExtension(filepath string) string {
|
|||
}
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
This kind of logical progression in our function names—from a high level of abstraction to a lower, more specific one—makes the code easier to follow and and read. Consider the alternative: If our highest level of abstraction is too specific, then we'll end up with a name that attempts to cover all bases, like `DetermineFileExtensionAndParseConfigurationFile`. This is horrendously difficult to read; we are trying to be too specific too soon and end up confusing the reader, despite trying to be clear!
|
||||
This kind of logical progression in our function names—from a high level of abstraction to a lower, more specific one—makes the code easier to follow and read. Consider the alternative: If our highest level of abstraction is too specific, then we'll end up with a name that attempts to cover all bases, like `DetermineFileExtensionAndParseConfigurationFile`. This is horrendously difficult to read; we are trying to be too specific too soon and end up confusing the reader, despite trying to be clear!
|
||||
|
||||
#### Variable Naming
|
||||
Rather interestingly, the opposite is true for variables. Unlike functions, our variables should be named from more to less specific the deeper we go into nested scopes.
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue